Triple
T7535535
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Jefferson County, Alabama |
E178139
|
entity |
| Predicate | contains |
P35
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Brighton, Alabama |
E688156
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Brighton, Alabama | Statement: [Jefferson County, Alabama, contains, Brighton, Alabama]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Brighton, Alabama Context triple: [Jefferson County, Alabama, contains, Brighton, Alabama]
-
A.
Brighton, Alabama
chosen
Brighton, Alabama is a small city in Jefferson County, part of the Birmingham metropolitan area in central Alabama.
-
B.
Brent, Alabama
Brent, Alabama is a small city in central Alabama known for its rural character and location within Bibb County.
-
C.
Bridgeport, Alabama
Bridgeport, Alabama is a small city in northeastern Alabama near the Tennessee border, known as the gateway community to the prehistoric Russell Cave National Monument.
-
D.
Fairfield, Alabama
Fairfield, Alabama is a small city in Jefferson County that functions as a residential and industrial suburb of Birmingham within central Alabama.
-
E.
Kingston, Alabama
Kingston, Alabama is an unincorporated rural community located in Shelby County in the central part of the state.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c69f2acdbc8190b5a8320168c1d0ba |
completed | March 27, 2026, 3:15 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6f84c13208190971096a0b81b0ff2 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 9:36 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69c98f54f0908190afec4f26e96d8173 |
completed | March 29, 2026, 8:45 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 3:47 p.m.