Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Statement: [Shelby County v. Holder, hasDissentingOpinionBy, Ruth Bader Ginsburg]

Target entity: Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Context triple: [Shelby County v. Holder, hasDissentingOpinionBy, Ruth Bader Ginsburg]

• A. Ruth Bader Ginsburg chosen
  Ruth Bader Ginsburg was a pioneering American lawyer and jurist who served as an Associate Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court and became a leading advocate for gender equality and civil rights.
• B. Jane C. Ginsburg
  Jane C. Ginsburg is an American legal scholar and Columbia Law School professor renowned for her expertise in copyright law.
• C. Sonia Sotomayor
  Sonia Sotomayor is an Associate Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, known for her liberal jurisprudence, powerful dissents, and status as the first Latina to serve on the nation’s highest court.
• D. Sandra Day O’Connor
  Sandra Day O’Connor was the first woman appointed to the U.S. Supreme Court and a pivotal moderate conservative justice known for her influential swing votes in landmark cases.
• E. Martin D. Ginsburg
  Martin D. Ginsburg was a prominent American tax lawyer and law professor, noted both for his influential scholarship in tax law and his supportive partnership with Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Target predicate: hasDissentingOpinionBy
Context triple: [Shelby County v. Holder, hasDissentingOpinionBy, Ruth Bader Ginsburg]

• A. hasDissentingJustice
  Indicates that within a judicial decision or ruling, there exists at least one justice who formally disagrees with the majority opinion.
• B. dissentingJustice chosen
  Indicates that a particular justice disagrees with the majority opinion or decision in a legal case.
• C. hasConcurringJustice
  Indicates that a judicial decision is associated with a justice who wrote or joined a concurring opinion.
• D. hasMajorityOpinionBy
  Indicates that a majority of the relevant group or decision-making body holds or supports the opinion expressed by the referenced entity.
• E. concurringJustice
  Indicates that a justice agrees with the court’s judgment or outcome but writes or joins a separate concurring opinion expressing different or additional reasoning.
• F. None of above.