Triple
T752790
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Gitlow v. New York |
E15485
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasJurisdictionBasis |
P6505
|
FINISHED |
| Object | federal constitutional question |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: federal constitutional question | Statement: [Gitlow v. New York, hasJurisdictionBasis, federal constitutional question]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasJurisdictionBasis Context triple: [Gitlow v. New York, hasJurisdictionBasis, federal constitutional question]
-
A.
hasJurisdictionOver
Indicates that one authority or governing body holds legal power or control to make and enforce decisions over another entity, area, or matter.
-
B.
jurisdictionBasis
chosen
Indicates the legal grounds or authority under which one entity has the right to exercise jurisdiction over another entity, action, or matter.
-
C.
definedJurisdictionOf
Indicates that one entity formally establishes or specifies the scope, boundaries, or authority of another entity’s jurisdiction.
-
D.
hasHigherJurisdiction
Indicates that one authority or legal body possesses superior legal power or decision-making control over another within a defined domain or scope.
-
E.
hasOriginalJurisdictionOver
Indicates that a legal body or authority has the power to hear and decide a case first, before any appellate review by higher bodies.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a493599a0081908da65f3407af1ef2 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:28 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4a64d7d2c8190a6059adcb8fbd34f |
completed | March 1, 2026, 8:49 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4a501c4cc81908de6d63e3d4f60d7 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 8:43 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:37 p.m.