Triple

T752710
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Equal Protection Clause E15484 entity
Predicate basisFor P125 FINISHED
Object Regents of the University of California v. Bakke E15486 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Regents of the University of California v. Bakke | Statement: [Equal Protection Clause, basisFor, Regents of the University of California v. Bakke]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Regents of the University of California v. Bakke
Context triple: [Equal Protection Clause, basisFor, Regents of the University of California v. Bakke]
  • A. Regents of the University of California v. Bakke chosen
    Regents of the University of California v. Bakke is a landmark 1978 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down rigid racial quotas in university admissions while upholding the constitutionality of using race as one factor among many to foster diversity.
  • B. McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents
    McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents is a 1950 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down racial segregation within a public university’s graduate program, marking an important step toward the desegregation of higher education.
  • C. Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin
    Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that challenged the constitutionality of race-conscious admissions policies at public universities under the Equal Protection Clause.
  • D. Plyler v. Doe
    Plyler v. Doe is a 1982 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held states cannot deny free public education to children based on their immigration status, recognizing such exclusion as a violation of the Equal Protection Clause.
  • E. San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez
    San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez is a landmark 1973 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court held that education is not a fundamental right under the Constitution, upholding school funding systems based on local property taxes.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a493599a0081908da65f3407af1ef2 completed March 1, 2026, 7:28 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4a64d7d2c8190a6059adcb8fbd34f completed March 1, 2026, 8:49 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69a65e426adc8190b7fa65aeacf8737f completed March 3, 2026, 4:06 a.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:37 p.m.