Triple

T752709
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Equal Protection Clause E15484 entity
Predicate basisFor P125 FINISHED
Object Korematsu v. United States (majority and later criticism) E80672 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Korematsu v. United States (majority and later criticism) | Statement: [Equal Protection Clause, basisFor, Korematsu v. United States (majority and later criticism)]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Korematsu v. United States (majority and later criticism)
Context triple: [Equal Protection Clause, basisFor, Korematsu v. United States (majority and later criticism)]
  • A. Korematsu v. United States (dissent) chosen
    Korematsu v. United States (dissent) is Justice Robert H. Jackson’s famous Supreme Court opinion condemning the wartime internment of Japanese Americans and warning against validating racial discrimination under the Constitution.
  • B. INS v. Chadha
    INS v. Chadha is a landmark 1983 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down the legislative veto as unconstitutional, significantly reshaping the balance of power between Congress and the executive branch.
  • C. Bolling v. Sharpe
    Bolling v. Sharpe is a 1954 U.S. Supreme Court case that held racial segregation in Washington, D.C. public schools unconstitutional under the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause.
  • D. Yamashita v. Styer
    Yamashita v. Styer is a landmark 1946 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the conviction of Japanese General Tomoyuki Yamashita and established the controversial "command responsibility" doctrine in international law.
  • E. Katzenbach v. Morgan
    Katzenbach v. Morgan is a 1966 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld Congress’s power under the Fourteenth Amendment to prohibit certain state voting restrictions, reinforcing federal authority to protect voting rights.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a493599a0081908da65f3407af1ef2 completed March 1, 2026, 7:28 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4a64d7d2c8190a6059adcb8fbd34f completed March 1, 2026, 8:49 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69a654eae9608190af3b410ecc041660 completed March 3, 2026, 3:26 a.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:37 p.m.