Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Duncan v. Louisiana, 391 U.S. 145 (1968) | Statement: [Duncan v. Louisiana, fullName, Duncan v. Louisiana, 391 U.S. 145 (1968)]

Target entity: Duncan v. Louisiana, 391 U.S. 145 (1968)
Context triple: [Duncan v. Louisiana, fullName, Duncan v. Louisiana, 391 U.S. 145 (1968)]

• A. Duncan v. Louisiana chosen
  Duncan v. Louisiana is a 1968 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held the Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial in criminal cases applies to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment.
• B. Roberts v. Louisiana
  Roberts v. Louisiana is a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court decision that, alongside Gregg v. Georgia, helped define the constitutional limits on capital punishment under the Eighth Amendment.
• C. Cox v. Louisiana
  Cox v. Louisiana is a landmark 1965 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the limits of state power to restrict public demonstrations and protected civil rights protest activities under the First Amendment.
• D. Stone v. Mississippi
  Stone v. Mississippi is an 1880 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a state cannot irrevocably surrender its police power, allowing Mississippi to prohibit a previously chartered lottery despite contractual claims.
• E. Powell v. Alabama
  Powell v. Alabama is a landmark 1932 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held in capital cases the Due Process Clause requires defendants be given access to effective legal counsel, especially when they are young, illiterate, or otherwise disadvantaged.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.