Triple
T7498105
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Mubahala |
E177183
|
entity |
| Predicate | jurisprudentialDiscussionIn |
P28367
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Sunni fiqh |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Sunni fiqh | Statement: [Mubahala, jurisprudentialDiscussionIn, Sunni fiqh]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: jurisprudentialDiscussionIn Context triple: [Mubahala, jurisprudentialDiscussionIn, Sunni fiqh]
-
A.
jurisprudenceDiscussedIn
chosen
Indicates that a topic, issue, or principle of jurisprudence is examined, analyzed, or debated within a particular document, discussion, or source.
-
B.
legalPhilosophy
Indicates the philosophical principles, theories, or viewpoints that underpin or guide a legal system, doctrine, or interpretation.
-
C.
legalDoctrine
Indicates that one legal principle, rule, or theory is being applied, referenced, or relied upon as an authoritative basis for interpreting or deciding a legal issue.
-
D.
legalAndEthicalDebate
Indicates a relationship where an issue, action, or decision is the subject of ongoing discussion and disagreement concerning both its legality and its ethical acceptability.
-
E.
discourse
Indicates that one entity engages in extended verbal or written communication or discussion with another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c69f2696688190915a8458f2398211 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 3:15 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6f81b431481908214b69c6c8d83bc |
completed | March 27, 2026, 9:35 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c6f4d266d88190982cf5d2ee2e9564 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 9:21 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 3:44 p.m.