Triple
T7486355
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Morse v. Frederick |
E176890
|
entity |
| Predicate | supremeCourtActionOnLowerCourt |
P76516
|
FINISHED |
| Object | reversed |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: reversed | Statement: [Morse v. Frederick, supremeCourtActionOnLowerCourt, reversed]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supremeCourtActionOnLowerCourt Context triple: [Morse v. Frederick, supremeCourtActionOnLowerCourt, reversed]
-
A.
supremeCourtOf
Indicates that one entity serves as the highest judicial authority (supreme court) within the jurisdiction or legal system of another entity.
-
B.
hasLowerCourt
Indicates that one court functions as a subordinate or inferior court within the judicial hierarchy of another court.
-
C.
higherCourtOf
Indicates that one court has legal authority to review, overrule, or supervise the decisions and actions of another, lower court in the judicial hierarchy.
-
D.
openedAsSupremeCourt
Indicates that an institution or court began its operation specifically in the capacity or status of a supreme court.
-
E.
upheldBy
Indicates that one entity is supported, maintained, or validated by another, often through approval, enforcement, or confirmation of its validity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c69f24ac508190bb98fe927c0bd065 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 3:15 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6f556955c8190bf014a065e04c5d8 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 9:23 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c6f03eeaa88190a5215772ed05ee9f |
completed | March 27, 2026, 9:01 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69c6f105e320819091db3cdb1f1351f0 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 9:05 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 3:42 p.m.