Triple
T7476630
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Timbs v. Indiana |
E176646
|
entity |
| Predicate | GorsuchConcurrenceBasis |
P33112
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Agreement with incorporation of Excessive Fines Clause |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Agreement with incorporation of Excessive Fines Clause | Statement: [Timbs v. Indiana, GorsuchConcurrenceBasis, Agreement with incorporation of Excessive Fines Clause]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: GorsuchConcurrenceBasis Context triple: [Timbs v. Indiana, GorsuchConcurrenceBasis, Agreement with incorporation of Excessive Fines Clause]
-
A.
concurringJustice
Indicates that a justice agrees with the court’s judgment or outcome but writes or joins a separate concurring opinion expressing different or additional reasoning.
-
B.
hasConcurringJustice
Indicates that a judicial decision is associated with a justice who wrote or joined a concurring opinion.
-
C.
constitutionalBasisOfHolding
chosen
Indicates that one legal holding is grounded in, justified by, or derived from a specific constitutional provision or principle.
-
D.
concurrenceInPartAndDissentInPartBy
Indicates that one party agrees with part of a decision or opinion and disagrees with another part, in relation to another party’s position.
-
E.
hasDissentingJustice
Indicates that within a judicial decision or ruling, there exists at least one justice who formally disagrees with the majority opinion.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c69f236ce08190a04d7679f03b29b2 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 3:15 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6f4ee23d081908e05658a651661fc |
completed | March 27, 2026, 9:21 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c6f03d967081908a8e696ff9693b90 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 9:01 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 3:41 p.m.