Triple
T7476615
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Timbs v. Indiana |
E176646
|
entity |
| Predicate | incorporationDoctrine |
P76471
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Selective incorporation |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Selective incorporation | Statement: [Timbs v. Indiana, incorporationDoctrine, Selective incorporation]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: incorporationDoctrine Context triple: [Timbs v. Indiana, incorporationDoctrine, Selective incorporation]
-
A.
incorporationAfter
Indicates that one entity is incorporated or formally established at a later time than another entity.
-
B.
incorporationPolicy
Indicates the rules or conditions under which one entity is formally integrated or merged into another entity or system.
-
C.
incorporatedAgainst
Indicates that a legal entity was formally incorporated in opposition to, or as a countermeasure against, another party.
-
D.
incorporationDescription
Indicates that a description is provided explaining the details, terms, or nature of an incorporation event or process.
-
E.
incorporatedByCase
Indicates that one legal case formally incorporates, adopts, or integrates the content, reasoning, or outcome of another case.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c69f236ce08190a04d7679f03b29b2 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 3:15 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6f4ee23d081908e05658a651661fc |
completed | March 27, 2026, 9:21 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c6f03d967081908a8e696ff9693b90 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 9:01 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69c6f105e320819091db3cdb1f1351f0 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 9:05 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 3:41 p.m.