Triple

T7476527
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Noerr-Pennington doctrine E176644 entity
Predicate clarifiedInCase P13052 FINISHED
Object Professional Real Estate Investors, Inc. v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc. E666876 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Professional Real Estate Investors, Inc. v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc. | Statement: [Noerr-Pennington doctrine, clarifiedInCase, Professional Real Estate Investors, Inc. v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc.]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Professional Real Estate Investors, Inc. v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc.
Context triple: [Noerr-Pennington doctrine, clarifiedInCase, Professional Real Estate Investors, Inc. v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc.]
  • A. Professional Real Estate Investors, Inc. v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc. chosen
    Professional Real Estate Investors, Inc. v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc. is a U.S. Supreme Court case that defined when litigation can be considered a "sham" unprotected by the First Amendment under antitrust law.
  • B. Lucas v. Earl
    Lucas v. Earl is a landmark 1930 U.S. Supreme Court tax law case that established the principle that income is taxed to the person who earns it, regardless of contractual arrangements to split or assign that income.
  • C. United States v. Schine Chain Theatres, Inc.
    United States v. Schine Chain Theatres, Inc. was a landmark U.S. antitrust Supreme Court case addressing monopolistic practices in the movie theater industry.
  • D. Stoneridge Investment Partners v. Scientific-Atlanta
    Stoneridge Investment Partners v. Scientific-Atlanta is a 2008 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited the scope of private securities fraud lawsuits by holding that secondary actors in a deceptive scheme are not liable under Section 10(b) unless their own conduct is directly relied upon by investors.
  • E. Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co.
    Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co. is a landmark 1968 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that Congress may prohibit all racial discrimination, private as well as public, in the sale or rental of property under 42 U.S.C. § 1982.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c69f236ce08190a04d7679f03b29b2 completed March 27, 2026, 3:15 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c6f4ee23d081908e05658a651661fc completed March 27, 2026, 9:21 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69c83c655fcc8190a23d8dd69a70431c completed March 28, 2026, 8:39 p.m.
Created at: March 27, 2026, 3:41 p.m.