Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Professional Real Estate Investors, Inc. v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc. | Statement: [BE&K Construction Co. v. NLRB, relatedCase, Professional Real Estate Investors, Inc. v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc.]

Target entity: Professional Real Estate Investors, Inc. v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc.
Context triple: [BE&K Construction Co. v. NLRB, relatedCase, Professional Real Estate Investors, Inc. v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc.]

• A. Lucas v. Earl
  Lucas v. Earl is a landmark 1930 U.S. Supreme Court tax law case that established the principle that income is taxed to the person who earns it, regardless of contractual arrangements to split or assign that income.
• B. United States v. Schine Chain Theatres, Inc.
  United States v. Schine Chain Theatres, Inc. was a landmark U.S. antitrust Supreme Court case addressing monopolistic practices in the movie theater industry.
• C. Stoneridge Investment Partners v. Scientific-Atlanta
  Stoneridge Investment Partners v. Scientific-Atlanta is a 2008 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited the scope of private securities fraud lawsuits by holding that secondary actors in a deceptive scheme are not liable under Section 10(b) unless their own conduct is directly relied upon by investors.
• D. Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co.
  Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co. is a landmark 1968 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that Congress may prohibit all racial discrimination, private as well as public, in the sale or rental of property under 42 U.S.C. § 1982.
• E. Eisner v. Macomber
  Eisner v. Macomber is a 1920 U.S. Supreme Court case that held a pro rata stock dividend was not taxable income under the Sixteenth Amendment, shaping early federal income tax doctrine.
• F. None of above. chosen
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. 
You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. 
# Instructions
Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. 
Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential.
# Response Format
Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"

Entity: Professional Real Estate Investors, Inc. v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc.
Triple: [BE&K Construction Co. v. NLRB, relatedCase, Professional Real Estate Investors, Inc. v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc.]

Professional Real Estate Investors, Inc. v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc. is a U.S. Supreme Court case that defined when litigation can be considered a "sham" unprotected by the First Amendment under antitrust law.

Target entity: Professional Real Estate Investors, Inc. v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc.
Target entity description: Professional Real Estate Investors, Inc. v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc. is a U.S. Supreme Court case that defined when litigation can be considered a "sham" unprotected by the First Amendment under antitrust law.

• A. Lucas v. Earl
  Lucas v. Earl is a landmark 1930 U.S. Supreme Court tax law case that established the principle that income is taxed to the person who earns it, regardless of contractual arrangements to split or assign that income.
• B. United States v. Schine Chain Theatres, Inc.
  United States v. Schine Chain Theatres, Inc. was a landmark U.S. antitrust Supreme Court case addressing monopolistic practices in the movie theater industry.
• C. Stoneridge Investment Partners v. Scientific-Atlanta
  Stoneridge Investment Partners v. Scientific-Atlanta is a 2008 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited the scope of private securities fraud lawsuits by holding that secondary actors in a deceptive scheme are not liable under Section 10(b) unless their own conduct is directly relied upon by investors.
• D. Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co.
  Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co. is a landmark 1968 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that Congress may prohibit all racial discrimination, private as well as public, in the sale or rental of property under 42 U.S.C. § 1982.
• E. Eisner v. Macomber
  Eisner v. Macomber is a 1920 U.S. Supreme Court case that held a pro rata stock dividend was not taxable income under the Sixteenth Amendment, shaping early federal income tax doctrine.
• F. None of above. chosen