Triple
T7414816
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Rijndael |
E171102
|
entity |
| Predicate | AESKeySize |
P8686
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 128 bits |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 128 bits | Statement: [Rijndael, AESKeySize, 128 bits]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: AESKeySize Context triple: [Rijndael, AESKeySize, 128 bits]
-
A.
consideredInsecureAtKeySize
Indicates that a cryptographic algorithm or mechanism is regarded as insecure when used with a specified key size.
-
B.
recommendedKeyLength
Indicates the suggested or optimal length that a cryptographic key should have for secure use in a given context.
-
C.
supportsKeyLength
chosen
Indicates that one entity is capable of handling, accepting, or operating with a specified cryptographic key length associated with another entity.
-
D.
usesEncryptionAlgorithm
Indicates that one entity applies or relies on a specific encryption algorithm to protect data or communications.
-
E.
cipherKey
Indicates that one entity serves as the cryptographic key used to encrypt or decrypt information associated with another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c68a618bdc81908d8018edadecd1a4 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:47 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6f2c509ac8190876f207267a33a3b |
completed | March 27, 2026, 9:12 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c6f0345040819094c5756dfa487faf |
completed | March 27, 2026, 9:01 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 3:11 p.m.