Triple
T7414667
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | CCMP |
E171099
|
entity |
| Predicate | macAlgorithm |
P54503
|
FINISHED |
| Object | cipher block chaining message authentication code |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: cipher block chaining message authentication code | Statement: [CCMP, macAlgorithm, cipher block chaining message authentication code]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: macAlgorithm Context triple: [CCMP, macAlgorithm, cipher block chaining message authentication code]
-
A.
usesEncryptionAlgorithm
Indicates that one entity applies or relies on a specific encryption algorithm to protect data or communications.
-
B.
algorithmType
Indicates the specific kind or category of algorithm associated with an entity or process.
-
C.
cryptographicModel
Indicates a relationship where one entity serves as, or is based on, a particular cryptographic scheme, framework, or formal model.
-
D.
hasAlgorithmName
chosen
Indicates that an entity is associated with or identified by a specific algorithm name.
-
E.
hasAlternativeMIC
Indicates that an entity is associated with an alternative minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) value, representing a different measured or applicable MIC than the primary one.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c68a618bdc81908d8018edadecd1a4 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:47 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6f2c509ac8190876f207267a33a3b |
completed | March 27, 2026, 9:12 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c6f0345040819094c5756dfa487faf |
completed | March 27, 2026, 9:01 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 3:11 p.m.