Triple
T7402802
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Black Opium |
E170788
|
entity |
| Predicate | marketingDescriptor |
P49968
|
FINISHED |
| Object | modern |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: modern | Statement: [Black Opium, marketingDescriptor, modern]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: marketingDescriptor Context triple: [Black Opium, marketingDescriptor, modern]
-
A.
marketingNameOf
Indicates that one entity is the marketing or brand name used to promote or refer to another entity.
-
B.
marketingClaim
Indicates that an entity asserts or promotes a statement about a product, service, or offering for marketing or advertising purposes.
-
C.
materialDescribedAs
chosen
Indicates that a material is characterized or specified using a particular descriptive term, label, or textual description.
-
D.
marketingModel
Indicates a relationship where an entity uses or is associated with a specific marketing model, framework, or strategy to guide promotional or market-related decisions.
-
E.
marketingAs
Indicates that one entity is being presented, promoted, or branded to others as if it were another specified entity, role, or category.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c68a6010108190925e5284de022660 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:47 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6f26ea27c8190a55e0e0314b463d8 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 9:11 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c6f0323b2c819098ab72c33e6d8534 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 9:01 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 3:10 p.m.