Triple
T738293
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Port-Royal Grammar |
E14983
|
entity |
| Predicate | philosophicalCurrent |
P3629
|
FINISHED |
| Object | rationalism |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: rationalism | Statement: [Port-Royal Grammar, philosophicalCurrent, rationalism]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: philosophicalCurrent Context triple: [Port-Royal Grammar, philosophicalCurrent, rationalism]
-
A.
philosophicalTheme
Indicates that a work, idea, or discourse centrally involves or explores a particular philosophical concept, question, or line of thought.
-
B.
philosophicalConcept
Indicates that one entity is a philosophical concept that characterizes, explains, or is thematically central to the other entity.
-
C.
philosophicalMethod
Indicates the method, approach, or technique used in conducting philosophical inquiry or reasoning.
-
D.
philosophicalTradition
chosen
Indicates a relationship where an entity is associated with, belongs to, or is characterized by a particular philosophical school, movement, or line of thought.
-
E.
philosophicalPositionExpressed
Indicates that an entity articulates, endorses, or otherwise conveys a specific philosophical stance, view, or doctrine.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a4934d9930819099eed80096b0597d |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:28 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4a64adf2c81908e48090be35dd9d9 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 8:49 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4a4fc734c81908fbd36386d5746d6 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 8:43 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:37 p.m.