Triple

T737104
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Darwin family E14956 entity
Predicate hasTraditionIn P19423 FINISHED
Object medicine LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: medicine | Statement: [Darwin family, hasTraditionIn, medicine]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasTraditionIn
Context triple: [Darwin family, hasTraditionIn, medicine]
  • A. hasWinningTradition
    Indicates that an entity (such as a team or organization) is characterized by a consistent history of success or victories in its competitive activities.
  • B. traditionSince
    Indicates that a tradition has been continuously practiced or recognized starting from a specified point in time.
  • C. traditionallyOneOf
    Indicates that something is customarily or historically considered to belong to a specific set, category, or group.
  • D. hasTraditionalSymbol
    Indicates that something is associated with or represented by a conventional or culturally established symbol.
  • E. hasTraditionalName
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a name traditionally used or recognized for it, often rooted in long-standing cultural or historical practice.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a4934d9930819099eed80096b0597d completed March 1, 2026, 7:28 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4a64adf2c81908e48090be35dd9d9 completed March 1, 2026, 8:49 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a4a4fc734c81908fbd36386d5746d6 completed March 1, 2026, 8:43 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a4a64957ec81909fe2e2dbffd80ed3 completed March 1, 2026, 8:49 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:37 p.m.