Triple

T7348948
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Article IV Section 3 Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution E169444 entity
Predicate usedInCase P13176 FINISHED
Object Kleppe v. New Mexico E262091 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Kleppe v. New Mexico | Statement: [Article IV Section 3 Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution, usedInCase, Kleppe v. New Mexico]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Kleppe v. New Mexico
Context triple: [Article IV Section 3 Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution, usedInCase, Kleppe v. New Mexico]
  • A. Kleppe v. New Mexico chosen
    Kleppe v. New Mexico is a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court case that affirmed broad federal authority over public lands and wildlife under the Constitution’s Property Clause.
  • B. Arizona v. Johnson
    Arizona v. Johnson is a 2009 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified police authority to frisk passengers during lawful traffic stops when officers reasonably suspect they are armed and dangerous.
  • C. Texas v. New Mexico
    Texas v. New Mexico is a U.S. Supreme Court interstate water rights case involving disputes over allocation and enforcement of river water compacts between the states.
  • D. Keech v Sandford
    Keech v Sandford is an 18th-century English trust law case establishing the strict fiduciary duty of loyalty, holding that trustees cannot personally profit from opportunities arising from their position.
  • E. Arizona v. United States
    Arizona v. United States is a 2012 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited state authority over immigration enforcement by affirming broad federal power in this area.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c68a5878888190968ce4d04db8d69f completed March 27, 2026, 1:47 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c6f0f269548190abdad3be6856ae8a completed March 27, 2026, 9:04 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69c7fa95b26481909f26389d1019da91 completed March 28, 2026, 3:58 p.m.
Created at: March 27, 2026, 3:05 p.m.