Triple

T7312480
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Aerolineas Plus E168126 entity
Predicate loyaltyObjective P57185 FINISHED
Object customer retention LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: customer retention | Statement: [Aerolineas Plus, loyaltyObjective, customer retention]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: loyaltyObjective
Context triple: [Aerolineas Plus, loyaltyObjective, customer retention]
  • A. loyaltyGoal chosen
    Indicates that one entity has the objective or commitment to remain faithful, supportive, or devoted to another entity or cause.
  • B. loyaltyIncentive
    Indicates a relationship where benefits or rewards are provided to encourage or recognize continued commitment or repeat engagement.
  • C. loyaltySymbolizedBy
    Indicates that an instance of loyalty is represented or expressed by a particular symbol or emblem.
  • D. loyaltyMechanism
    Indicates a mechanism or process through which loyalty is established, maintained, or reinforced between entities.
  • E. loyaltyDomain
    Indicates a relationship where loyalty, allegiance, or steadfast support is directed toward or governed by a particular domain, context, or sphere of influence.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c6888d8e3c81909db79714903baf31 completed March 27, 2026, 1:39 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c6ec00fef081909cb9768a70cabd80 completed March 27, 2026, 8:43 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c6e7705f4881909793071dee50c557 completed March 27, 2026, 8:24 p.m.
Created at: March 27, 2026, 3:02 p.m.