Triple

T7297485
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Paul Mockapetris E164560 entity
Predicate standardizedIn P7508 FINISHED
Object RFC 882 E36655 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: RFC 882 | Statement: [Paul Mockapetris, standardizedIn, RFC 882]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: RFC 882
Context triple: [Paul Mockapetris, standardizedIn, RFC 882]
  • A. RFC 882 chosen
    RFC 882 was an early Internet standard that originally specified the Domain Name System (DNS) protocol before being superseded by later RFCs such as RFC 1035.
  • B. RFC 883
    RFC 883 was an early Internet standard that originally specified the Domain Name System (DNS) before being superseded by later DNS specifications.
  • C. RFC 862
    RFC 862 is an Internet standard that specifies the Echo Protocol, a simple service used primarily for testing and measurement by sending data to a server that returns it unchanged.
  • D. RFC 1108
    RFC 1108 is an early Internet standards document that specifies security options for the Internet Protocol (IP), particularly for use in military and other high-security environments.
  • E. RFC 1072
    RFC 1072 is an early TCP/IP standards document that introduced experimental TCP extensions for high-performance and long-delay networks.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c6887a499881909dd23341399c59d8 completed March 27, 2026, 1:39 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c6eb8e48d48190ada4d507f3b61bc4 completed March 27, 2026, 8:41 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69c7e54c25c88190891311b72f242e86 completed March 28, 2026, 2:27 p.m.
Created at: March 27, 2026, 3 p.m.