Triple
T7292468
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Polk County, Missouri |
E164429
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasJurisdiction |
P285
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Fair Play, Missouri |
E654846
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Fair Play, Missouri | Statement: [Polk County, Missouri, hasJurisdiction, Fair Play, Missouri]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Fair Play, Missouri Context triple: [Polk County, Missouri, hasJurisdiction, Fair Play, Missouri]
-
A.
Fair Play, Missouri
chosen
Fair Play, Missouri is a small rural city located in Polk County in the southwestern region of the state.
-
B.
Oakview, Missouri
Oakview, Missouri is a small suburban village in Clay County that forms part of the Kansas City metropolitan area.
-
C.
Bowling Green, Missouri
Bowling Green, Missouri is a small city in Pike County that serves as a local commercial and administrative center in northeastern Missouri.
-
D.
Greenfield, Missouri
Greenfield, Missouri is a small city in southwestern Missouri that serves as the administrative and commercial hub of Dade County.
-
E.
Rucker, Missouri
Rucker, Missouri is an unincorporated rural community located in Randolph County in the U.S. state of Missouri.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c6887a499881909dd23341399c59d8 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:39 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6eb6fc5788190b1b339d051f93c22 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 8:41 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69c7eedfa4d08190997a692b81309309 |
completed | March 28, 2026, 3:08 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 3 p.m.