Triple

T7268773
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Nowy Sącz County E161045 entity
Predicate administrativeSeat P21613 FINISHED
Object Nowy Sącz E23790 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Nowy Sącz | Statement: [Nowy Sącz County, administrativeSeat, Nowy Sącz]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Nowy Sącz
Context triple: [Nowy Sącz County, administrativeSeat, Nowy Sącz]
  • A. Nowy Sącz chosen
    Nowy Sącz is a historic city in southern Poland known for its well-preserved Old Town, cultural heritage, and role as a local economic and administrative center.
  • B. Stary Sącz
    Stary Sącz is a historic town in southern Poland known for its well-preserved medieval urban layout and cultural heritage.
  • C. Sianów
    Sianów is a small town in northwestern Poland known for its historical ties to the Pomerania region and its location near the Baltic coast.
  • D. Szczecinek
    Szczecinek is a town in northwestern Poland known for its lakeside setting, historic architecture, and role as a local economic and cultural center in the West Pomeranian Voivodeship.
  • E. Nowy Wiśnicz
    Nowy Wiśnicz is a historic town in southern Poland’s Lesser Poland Voivodeship, known for its well-preserved Renaissance castle and old town.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c6885181008190b419040e22939c7c completed March 27, 2026, 1:38 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c6eae8cc288190bc3ae3c7b38980d0 completed March 27, 2026, 8:39 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69e215ac56248190a75ad5ceb8152d5a completed April 17, 2026, 11:12 a.m.
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:58 p.m.