Triple
T7231300
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | John G. Heyburn II |
E154907
|
entity |
| Predicate | notableCase |
P4
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Love v. Beshear |
E155097
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Love v. Beshear | Statement: [John G. Heyburn II, notableCase, Love v. Beshear]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Love v. Beshear Context triple: [John G. Heyburn II, notableCase, Love v. Beshear]
-
A.
Love v. Beshear
chosen
Love v. Beshear is a landmark federal court case that contributed to the legalization of same-sex marriage in Kentucky and helped pave the way for the U.S. Supreme Court’s nationwide marriage equality ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges.
-
B.
Bourke v. Beshear
Bourke v. Beshear was a landmark federal court case from Kentucky challenging the state's same-sex marriage ban, later incorporated into the U.S. Supreme Court’s Obergefell v. Hodges decision that legalized same-sex marriage nationwide.
-
C.
McCreary County v. ACLU of Kentucky
McCreary County v. ACLU of Kentucky is a 2005 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court held that displaying the Ten Commandments in Kentucky courthouses violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.
-
D.
Duncan v. Louisiana
Duncan v. Louisiana is a 1968 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held the Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial in criminal cases applies to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment.
-
E.
Roberts v. Louisiana
Roberts v. Louisiana is a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court decision that, alongside Gregg v. Georgia, helped define the constitutional limits on capital punishment under the Eighth Amendment.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c68811dd1c8190ac460bb39e64e1f0 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6ea0f09648190b285993556f704d5 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 8:35 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69c7db0c60148190b066e04f98b91dce |
completed | March 28, 2026, 1:43 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:54 p.m.