Triple
T722078
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Werl Prison |
E14637
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasHistoricalPeriodOfSpecialUse |
P3656
|
FINISHED |
| Object | immediate post-war years |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: immediate post-war years | Statement: [Werl Prison, hasHistoricalPeriodOfSpecialUse, immediate post-war years]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasHistoricalPeriodOfSpecialUse Context triple: [Werl Prison, hasHistoricalPeriodOfSpecialUse, immediate post-war years]
-
A.
historicalPeriodOfUse
chosen
Indicates the time period during which something was in active use or commonly utilized.
-
B.
hasHistoricalSignificance
Indicates that something possesses notable importance or influence within a historical context or period.
-
C.
historicallyUsedFor
Indicates that something served a particular function or purpose at some point in the past, even if it may no longer be used that way now.
-
D.
hasHistoriographicalUse
Indicates that something is used or cited within historical writing or analysis as part of constructing, interpreting, or debating historical narratives.
-
E.
historicallyConsidered
Indicates that one entity has been regarded or classified in a particular way relative to another entity during a past historical period.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a4934c753c81909b309027e48b9b3a |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:28 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4a591124c8190842e7ef18b064198 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 8:46 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4a4f513608190b716b939d574c292 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 8:43 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:37 p.m.