Triple
T7206044
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Parc naturel régional des Volcans d’Auvergne |
E148668
|
entity |
| Predicate | crossesDepartment |
P27425
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Cantal |
E52560
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Cantal | Statement: [Parc naturel régional des Volcans d’Auvergne, crossesDepartment, Cantal]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Cantal Context triple: [Parc naturel régional des Volcans d’Auvergne, crossesDepartment, Cantal]
-
A.
Cantal
chosen
Cantal is a rural department in south-central France known for its volcanic landscapes, pastoral agriculture, and the production of Cantal cheese.
-
B.
Monforte d’Alba
Monforte d’Alba is a renowned wine-producing village in Italy’s Piedmont region, celebrated for its high-quality Barolo wines and picturesque Langhe hillside landscapes.
-
C.
Vernazobre
Vernazobre is a river in southern France that serves as a tributary of the Orb.
-
D.
Fassano
Fassano is an alternative name for the village of Fodom in the Veneto region of northern Italy.
-
E.
Osona
Osona is a historical inland comarca in Catalonia, Spain, known for its rural landscapes, medieval towns, and the city of Vic as its main urban center.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c687e8cf188190b5f3ecffd681f04e |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:36 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6e94ef5cc81908c33adcedf5c5054 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 8:32 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69c7bfc0ac008190b3ea46b4e5f13287 |
completed | March 28, 2026, 11:47 a.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:52 p.m.