Triple
T7198877
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | James Earl Ray |
E168685
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalStatusInMLKCase |
P75766
|
FINISHED |
| Object | convicted assassin of Martin Luther King Jr. |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: convicted assassin of Martin Luther King Jr. | Statement: [James Earl Ray, legalStatusInMLKCase, convicted assassin of Martin Luther King Jr.]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalStatusInMLKCase Context triple: [James Earl Ray, legalStatusInMLKCase, convicted assassin of Martin Luther King Jr.]
-
A.
MLKStudiedAt
Indicates that Martin Luther King Jr. pursued formal studies or education at the specified institution.
-
B.
legalStatusAfter1954
Indicates the legal status or condition that an entity holds from the year 1954 onward.
-
C.
laterPositionOnCivilRights
Indicates that one entity adopted or expressed a more advanced, progressive, or supportive stance on civil rights than another entity, typically at a subsequent time.
-
D.
landmarkCase
Indicates that a legal case is historically significant or precedent-setting within a legal system.
-
E.
legalPrecedentInvolved
Indicates that a particular legal precedent (prior court decision or ruling) is relevant to, cited in, or forms the basis for the current legal matter or action.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c68a5376748190bb500f03df86e93e |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:46 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6e92b8bc08190bfcdd34ce42e3448 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 8:31 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c6e757fed4819091b0a096e3befc3a |
completed | March 27, 2026, 8:23 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69c6e8fd9b848190b2b1beea5698422b |
completed | March 27, 2026, 8:30 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:52 p.m.