Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Roe v. Wade | Statement: [Stenberg v. Carhart, reliesOnPrecedent, Roe v. Wade]

Target entity: Roe v. Wade
Context triple: [Stenberg v. Carhart, reliesOnPrecedent, Roe v. Wade]

• A. Roe v. Wade chosen
  Roe v. Wade was a landmark 1973 U.S. Supreme Court decision that recognized a constitutional right to abortion, profoundly shaping American law and politics until it was overturned in 2022.
• B. Planned Parenthood v. Casey
  Planned Parenthood v. Casey is a landmark 1992 U.S. Supreme Court decision that reaffirmed the constitutional right to abortion while allowing greater state regulation under the “undue burden” standard.
• C. Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization
  Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization is the 2022 U.S. Supreme Court decision that overturned Roe v. Wade and ended the federal constitutional right to abortion.
• D. Regan v. Wald
  Regan v. Wald is a 1984 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld federal restrictions on travel to Cuba, affirming broad executive authority over foreign affairs and economic sanctions.
• E. Doe v. Bolton
  Doe v. Bolton is a 1973 U.S. Supreme Court decision that, alongside Roe v. Wade, expanded and defined the scope of abortion rights by striking down restrictive state regulations.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Target predicate: reliesOnPrecedent
Context triple: [Stenberg v. Carhart, reliesOnPrecedent, Roe v. Wade]

• A. precedentFor chosen
  Indicates that one situation, decision, or case serves as an authoritative example or basis for deciding or interpreting another.
• B. precedentInterpreted
  Indicates that one legal precedent is interpreted or understood in a particular way, often as clarified or applied in subsequent decisions or analyses.
• C. typicalPrecedent
  Indicates that one situation, case, or event serves as a standard or commonly followed example for how similar later situations are handled.
• D. precedentSystem
  Indicates that one legal system or framework serves as a source of precedent or authoritative guidance for another system.
• E. modifiedPrecedent
  Indicates that one entity has altered, qualified, or changed the terms, scope, or interpretation of a prior decision, rule, or precedent.
• F. None of above.