Triple
T7159217
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Intelligence Community Assessment |
E166894
|
entity |
| Predicate | mayAddress |
P28526
|
FINISHED |
| Object | cybersecurity threats |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: cybersecurity threats | Statement: [Intelligence Community Assessment, mayAddress, cybersecurity threats]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: mayAddress Context triple: [Intelligence Community Assessment, mayAddress, cybersecurity threats]
-
A.
canAddress
chosen
Indicates that one entity has the ability or permission to direct communication, action, or service toward another entity.
-
B.
addressedBy
Indicates that something (such as an issue, request, or item) is handled, dealt with, or responded to by a particular agent or entity.
-
C.
addressedThrough
Indicates that an issue, request, or communication is handled, resolved, or processed by means of a specified channel, method, or intermediary.
-
D.
hasAddress
Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific address or location.
-
E.
address
Indicates that one entity directs spoken or written communication specifically to another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c68887a5cc8190bec0ea96227164f7 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:39 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6e811d6b081909dafeee1d820c74f |
completed | March 27, 2026, 8:26 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c6e1cd5c948190a9113b23f7308c21 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 8 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:47 p.m.