Triple
T7150445
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Milstein method |
E166677
|
entity |
| Predicate | alsoAnalyzedFor |
P62814
|
FINISHED |
| Object | weak convergence |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: weak convergence | Statement: [Milstein method, alsoAnalyzedFor, weak convergence]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: alsoAnalyzedFor Context triple: [Milstein method, alsoAnalyzedFor, weak convergence]
-
A.
hasAnalysis
chosen
Indicates that an entity is associated with, or has undergone, a particular analysis or examination.
-
B.
analyzes
Indicates that one entity systematically examines or evaluates another entity to understand its nature, structure, or components.
-
C.
helpsAnalyze
Indicates that one entity assists another in examining, interpreting, or understanding something in a more detailed or effective way.
-
D.
difficultToAnalyzeAs
Indicates that one entity is hard to examine, interpret, or understand when considered in terms of, or compared to, another entity.
-
E.
unitOfAnalysis
Indicates the primary entity, level, or component that is being examined or measured in a given analysis or study.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c68886779c8190a8e3fbabffe68253 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:39 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6e7f28b188190b1732ca711666531 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 8:26 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c6e1caf4e48190b47bb398a3c1554d |
completed | March 27, 2026, 8 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:46 p.m.