Triple
T7149261
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | St. Mary’s Honor Center v. Hicks |
E166648
|
entity |
| Predicate | citationStyle |
P4468
|
FINISHED |
| Object | St. Mary’s Honor Ctr. v. Hicks, 509 U.S. 502 (1993) |
E166648
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: St. Mary’s Honor Ctr. v. Hicks, 509 U.S. 502 (1993) | Statement: [St. Mary’s Honor Center v. Hicks, citationStyle, St. Mary’s Honor Ctr. v. Hicks, 509 U.S. 502 (1993)]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: St. Mary’s Honor Ctr. v. Hicks, 509 U.S. 502 (1993) Context triple: [St. Mary’s Honor Center v. Hicks, citationStyle, St. Mary’s Honor Ctr. v. Hicks, 509 U.S. 502 (1993)]
-
A.
St. Mary’s Honor Center v. Hicks
chosen
St. Mary’s Honor Center v. Hicks is a 1993 U.S. Supreme Court decision that tightened the burden on plaintiffs in employment discrimination cases by holding that proving an employer’s stated reason is pretextual does not automatically establish intentional discrimination.
-
B.
Pennhurst State School & Hospital v. Halderman
Pennhurst State School & Hospital v. Halderman is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that limited federal court authority over state institutions by holding that the Eleventh Amendment bars federal courts from ordering state officials to comply with state law.
-
C.
Adkins v. Children’s Hospital
Adkins v. Children’s Hospital is a 1923 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down a minimum wage law for women in the District of Columbia, marking a key moment in the Lochner-era protection of freedom of contract.
-
D.
Nevada Department of Human Resources v. Hibbs
Nevada Department of Human Resources v. Hibbs is a 2003 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld Congress’s power to subject states to damages suits under the Family and Medical Leave Act as a valid exercise of its enforcement authority under the Fourteenth Amendment.
-
E.
Regan v. Wald
Regan v. Wald is a 1984 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld federal restrictions on travel to Cuba, affirming broad executive authority over foreign affairs and economic sanctions.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c68886779c8190a8e3fbabffe68253 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:39 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6e7f130e08190bc5ca99f90f9de92 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 8:26 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69c7b8ee0244819084d5dfb3ee64149b |
completed | March 28, 2026, 11:18 a.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:46 p.m.