Triple

T7149211
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Texas Dept. of Community Affairs v. Burdine E166647 entity
Predicate citedIn P771 FINISHED
Object Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc. E166649 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc. | Statement: [Texas Dept. of Community Affairs v. Burdine, citedIn, Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.
Context triple: [Texas Dept. of Community Affairs v. Burdine, citedIn, Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.]
  • A. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc. chosen
    Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc. is a 2000 U.S. Supreme Court decision that clarified the standards for proving age discrimination under the ADEA, particularly the role of pretext and circumstantial evidence in employment discrimination cases.
  • B. Lucas v. Earl
    Lucas v. Earl is a landmark 1930 U.S. Supreme Court tax law case that established the principle that income is taxed to the person who earns it, regardless of contractual arrangements to split or assign that income.
  • C. Sibbach v. Wilson & Co.
    Sibbach v. Wilson & Co. is a 1941 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the validity of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure under the Rules Enabling Act and helped define the scope of federal procedural rulemaking.
  • D. Pruneyard Shopping Center v. Robins
    Pruneyard Shopping Center v. Robins is a landmark 1980 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that states may grant broader free speech rights in private shopping centers under their own constitutions than those guaranteed by the federal Constitution.
  • E. McDonald v. Smith
    McDonald v. Smith is a 1985 U.S. Supreme Court case that held the First Amendment’s Petition Clause does not grant absolute immunity from libel suits for statements made in petitions to government officials.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c68886779c8190a8e3fbabffe68253 completed March 27, 2026, 1:39 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c6e7f130e08190bc5ca99f90f9de92 completed March 27, 2026, 8:26 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69c7ada940e08190b16e97e363801e75 completed March 28, 2026, 10:30 a.m.
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:46 p.m.