Triple
T7138349
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Mr Goon |
E166369
|
entity |
| Predicate | typicalPortrayal |
P49090
|
FINISHED |
| Object | incompetent compared to the child detectives |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: incompetent compared to the child detectives | Statement: [Mr Goon, typicalPortrayal, incompetent compared to the child detectives]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typicalPortrayal Context triple: [Mr Goon, typicalPortrayal, incompetent compared to the child detectives]
-
A.
portrayalFeature
chosen
Indicates that one entity serves as a characteristic, aspect, or attribute highlighted in the depiction or representation of another entity.
-
B.
portrayalRecognition
Indicates that one entity recognizes or identifies another entity as a portrayal or representation of a particular subject or character.
-
C.
portrayalIntendedAs
Indicates that one entity is meant to represent, depict, or stand in for another entity in an intentional portrayal.
-
D.
portrayalIntroduced
Indicates that one entity is introduced or presented as a portrayal or depiction of another entity.
-
E.
portrayalReception
Indicates how a particular portrayal of someone or something is received, evaluated, or responded to by an audience or observers.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c68884a9388190af42f90d1c1a7151 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:39 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6e694cc3c81908b0d54c2496a0722 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 8:20 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c6e1c932888190b125ca3785b18553 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 8 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:45 p.m.