Triple
T712273
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Oregon Administrative Rules |
E14235
|
entity |
| Predicate | adoptionProcess |
P7523
|
FINISHED |
| Object | rulemaking procedures including public notice and comment |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: rulemaking procedures including public notice and comment | Statement: [Oregon Administrative Rules, adoptionProcess, rulemaking procedures including public notice and comment]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: adoptionProcess Context triple: [Oregon Administrative Rules, adoptionProcess, rulemaking procedures including public notice and comment]
-
A.
adoptedThrough
chosen
Indicates that an adoption relationship was established or carried out by means of a specified process, channel, or intermediary.
-
B.
adoptionEvent
Indicates an event in which one party legally or formally assumes parental or custodial responsibility for another.
-
C.
adopts
Indicates that one entity formally takes another into its care, control, or use, assuming ongoing responsibility or ownership.
-
D.
adoptiveChild
Indicates that one entity is the child of another through legal adoption rather than biological descent.
-
E.
adoptedUnder
Indicates that something has been formally accepted, implemented, or brought into effect according to a specified rule, procedure, or authority.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a4934a36e081909e7abef98b898a4e |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:28 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4a77fcc6881908a025bb21e44ad56 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 8:54 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4a4f221b081909fbaa689fb20eb3e |
completed | March 1, 2026, 8:43 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:36 p.m.