Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Altitude Express, Inc. v. Zarda | Statement: [Gerald Lynn Bostock, combinedWithCases, Altitude Express, Inc. v. Zarda]

Target entity: Altitude Express, Inc. v. Zarda
Context triple: [Gerald Lynn Bostock, combinedWithCases, Altitude Express, Inc. v. Zarda]

• A. Altitude Express Inc. v. Zarda chosen
  Altitude Express Inc. v. Zarda is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that held federal employment discrimination law protects gay and lesbian employees from being fired because of their sexual orientation.
• B. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green
  McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green is a 1973 U.S. Supreme Court decision that established the key burden-shifting framework for proving employment discrimination under Title VII.
• C. Hurd v. Hodge
  Hurd v. Hodge is a 1948 U.S. Supreme Court case that held racially restrictive covenants in property deeds could not be judicially enforced in the District of Columbia because such enforcement would violate the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause.
• D. Ray v. Blair
  Ray v. Blair is a 1952 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a state's authority to require presidential electors to pledge support for their party's nominees as a condition of appointment.
• E. Wards Cove Packing Co. v. Atonio
  Wards Cove Packing Co. v. Atonio is a 1989 U.S. Supreme Court case that narrowed the standards for proving employment discrimination under Title VII, prompting Congress to later revise those standards in the Civil Rights Act of 1991.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Target predicate: combinedWithCases
Context triple: [Gerald Lynn Bostock, combinedWithCases, Altitude Express, Inc. v. Zarda]

• A. combinedIn
  Indicates that two or more entities are merged, joined, or used together to form a single combined whole or context.
• B. oneOfCasesIn
  Indicates that an entity is one specific member of a defined set or collection of possible cases.
• C. combinationType
  Indicates how multiple elements are combined or related to each other within a composite structure or operation.
• D. relatedCase chosen
  Indicates that one legal case is connected or associated with another case, such as through shared facts, parties, issues, or procedural history.
• E. numberOfCases
  Indicates the total count of individual instances, occurrences, or records associated with a particular situation, condition, or category.
• F. None of above.