Triple
T7094367
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Gerald Lynn Bostock |
E165283
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalPrecedentEstablished |
P2931
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Title VII prohibits employment discrimination based on sexual orientation |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Title VII prohibits employment discrimination based on sexual orientation | Statement: [Gerald Lynn Bostock, legalPrecedentEstablished, Title VII prohibits employment discrimination based on sexual orientation]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalPrecedentEstablished Context triple: [Gerald Lynn Bostock, legalPrecedentEstablished, Title VII prohibits employment discrimination based on sexual orientation]
-
A.
legalPrecedentInvolved
Indicates that a particular legal precedent (prior court decision or ruling) is relevant to, cited in, or forms the basis for the current legal matter or action.
-
B.
hasCourtPrecedence
Indicates that one court decision or ruling holds authoritative priority over another in legal reasoning or application.
-
C.
legalOutcome
chosen
Indicates the resulting legal status, decision, or consequence that follows from a legal process, action, or judgment.
-
D.
typicalPrecedent
Indicates that one situation, case, or event serves as a standard or commonly followed example for how similar later situations are handled.
-
E.
precedentInterpreted
Indicates that one legal precedent is interpreted or understood in a particular way, often as clarified or applied in subsequent decisions or analyses.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c6887e8c10819091cee237560d32da |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:39 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6e55159848190a794ad77e60c5525 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 8:15 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c6e1c172148190bf290c07bf579d1f |
completed | March 27, 2026, 8 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:41 p.m.