Triple
T7094080
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Meritor Savings Bank, FSB |
E165276
|
entity |
| Predicate | allegationsInCase |
P52031
|
FINISHED |
| Object | hostile work environment sexual harassment |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: hostile work environment sexual harassment | Statement: [Meritor Savings Bank, FSB, allegationsInCase, hostile work environment sexual harassment]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: allegationsInCase Context triple: [Meritor Savings Bank, FSB, allegationsInCase, hostile work environment sexual harassment]
-
A.
allegedAction
chosen
Indicates that an action is claimed or asserted to have occurred, typically without being proven or confirmed.
-
B.
allegedStatus
Indicates that a particular status or condition is claimed or asserted about an entity, but has not been confirmed as true.
-
C.
disputeInvolves
Indicates that a particular dispute includes or concerns the specified entities as participants or parties to the conflict.
-
D.
associatedCourtCase
Indicates a relationship where one entity is linked to, or involved in, a particular court case.
-
E.
coAccusedInCaseWith
Indicates that two or more entities are jointly accused as defendants in the same legal case.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c6887e8c10819091cee237560d32da |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:39 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6e55159848190a794ad77e60c5525 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 8:15 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c6e1c172148190bf290c07bf579d1f |
completed | March 27, 2026, 8 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:41 p.m.