Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson | Statement: [Meritor Savings Bank, FSB, employerInCase, Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson]

Target entity: Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson
Context triple: [Meritor Savings Bank, FSB, employerInCase, Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson]

• A. Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson chosen
  Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson is a 1986 U.S. Supreme Court case that first recognized workplace sexual harassment as a form of sex discrimination actionable under Title VII.
• B. Northeast Bancorp, Inc. v. Board of Governors
  Northeast Bancorp, Inc. v. Board of Governors is a 1985 U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed whether regional interstate banking compacts among states violated the Constitution’s Compact Clause and related federal banking laws.
• C. Lucas v. Earl
  Lucas v. Earl is a landmark 1930 U.S. Supreme Court tax law case that established the principle that income is taxed to the person who earns it, regardless of contractual arrangements to split or assign that income.
• D. Eisner v. Macomber
  Eisner v. Macomber is a 1920 U.S. Supreme Court case that held a pro rata stock dividend was not taxable income under the Sixteenth Amendment, shaping early federal income tax doctrine.
• E. United States Trust Co. v. New Jersey
  United States Trust Co. v. New Jersey is a 1977 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the limits of state power to impair public contracts under the Constitution’s Contract Clause.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Target predicate: employerInCase
Context triple: [Meritor Savings Bank, FSB, employerInCase, Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson]

• A. employerIn chosen
  Indicates that one entity serves as the employer of another within a specified context, such as a location, organization, or time period.
• B. employerSide
  Indicates that the subject participates in or represents the employer’s position, interests, or perspective within an employment relationship or dispute.
• C. employer
  Indicates a relationship where one entity hires, pays, and oversees the work of another entity.
• D. parentEmployer
  Indicates that one organization is the direct or higher-level employer of another organization or entity.
• E. employerInUniverse
  Indicates that one entity serves as the employer of another within a specified universe, context, or world.
• F. None of above.