Triple
T7037638
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Philip Barton Key II |
E163423
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalCaseSignificance |
P12084
|
FINISHED |
| Object | early and prominent use of the temporary insanity defense in U.S. law |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: early and prominent use of the temporary insanity defense in U.S. law | Statement: [Philip Barton Key II, legalCaseSignificance, early and prominent use of the temporary insanity defense in U.S. law]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalCaseSignificance Context triple: [Philip Barton Key II, legalCaseSignificance, early and prominent use of the temporary insanity defense in U.S. law]
-
A.
legalSignificance
chosen
Indicates that something has recognized importance, effect, or consequence within a legal context or system.
-
B.
legalCaseAlongside
Indicates that two or more legal cases are proceeding in parallel or in coordination, such that they are related or handled together in some aspect of the legal process.
-
C.
legalCase
Indicates a relationship where a formal legal dispute or proceeding exists between parties, typically adjudicated by a court or similar authority.
-
D.
legalPrecedentInvolved
Indicates that a particular legal precedent (prior court decision or ruling) is relevant to, cited in, or forms the basis for the current legal matter or action.
-
E.
legalOutcome
Indicates the resulting legal status, decision, or consequence that follows from a legal process, action, or judgment.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c6885e7c1c8190be32a8f79ab4e0cf |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6e4a3c36c819080942c59f1830ae8 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 8:12 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c6e1bb602081908bfa6186a1f5a4b4 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 7:59 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:36 p.m.