Triple
T7030105
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Alevism |
E163246
|
entity |
| Predicate | selfIdentificationDebate |
P49860
|
FINISHED |
| Object | whether Alevism is inside or outside Islam |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: whether Alevism is inside or outside Islam | Statement: [Alevism, selfIdentificationDebate, whether Alevism is inside or outside Islam]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: selfIdentificationDebate Context triple: [Alevism, selfIdentificationDebate, whether Alevism is inside or outside Islam]
-
A.
selfIdentification
Indicates that an entity defines or declares its own identity, attributes, or classification about itself.
-
B.
partOfDebate
chosen
Indicates that one entity is a component, segment, or participant within a larger debate or argumentative exchange.
-
C.
inAcademicDebate
Indicates that one entity is engaged in a formal, scholarly argument or discussion with another entity, typically following academic norms and methods of reasoning.
-
D.
modernPoliticalIdentity
Indicates that an entity’s political identity, affiliation, or stance is characterized by contemporary or current-era political ideas, movements, or frameworks.
-
E.
canDebate
Indicates that one entity has the ability or permission to engage in a debate or argumentative discussion with another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c6885d691c81908cf7d31083113886 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6e458ad9c81908c3f492b317ce291 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 8:11 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c6e1b9a2488190aea351d96afa5a12 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 7:59 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:35 p.m.