Triple
T7022971
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | St Ann’s Well |
E162872
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasContinuousFlow |
P8240
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [St Ann’s Well, hasContinuousFlow, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasContinuousFlow Context triple: [St Ann’s Well, hasContinuousFlow, true]
-
A.
hasFlowRegime
chosen
Indicates that one entity is characterized by, or operates under, a particular pattern or regime of flow.
-
B.
hasRepresentationContinuity
Indicates that one entity maintains a consistent or continuous representational relationship with another across time, context, or state changes.
-
C.
hasContinuation
Indicates that one entity serves as a continuation or subsequent part of another entity in a sequence or process.
-
D.
continuityStatus
Indicates the state of whether something continues without interruption or has been broken, paused, or reset over time.
-
E.
continuityType
Indicates the specific manner or pattern in which continuity is maintained or transitions occur between related elements or states.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c6885b26248190a857541e3d10e299 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6e5ecd4488190bf19e42de55da98b |
completed | March 27, 2026, 8:17 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c6e1b8118481909d76eb6616160e80 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 7:59 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:35 p.m.