Triple

T699396
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject New York v. United States (1992) E13964 entity
Predicate fullCaseName P3131 FINISHED
Object New York, et al. v. United States, et al. E13964 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: New York, et al. v. United States, et al. | Statement: [New York v. United States (1992), fullCaseName, New York, et al. v. United States, et al.]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: New York, et al. v. United States, et al.
Context triple: [New York v. United States (1992), fullCaseName, New York, et al. v. United States, et al.]
  • A. New York v. United States (1992) chosen
    New York v. United States (1992) is a landmark Supreme Court case that limited federal power by holding that Congress cannot compel states to enact or enforce federal regulatory programs, reinforcing the Tenth Amendment’s anti-commandeering principle.
  • B. New York v. Trump Entrepreneur Initiative LLC
    New York v. Trump Entrepreneur Initiative LLC is a high-profile civil fraud lawsuit brought by the New York Attorney General alleging that Trump University misled students with deceptive business and educational practices.
  • C. United States v. [Accused]
    "United States v. [Accused]" is the standard case caption format used in criminal prosecutions brought by the U.S. government against individual service members in the military justice system.
  • D. Chiafalo v. Washington
    Chiafalo v. Washington is a 2020 U.S. Supreme Court case that unanimously upheld states’ authority to penalize or replace “faithless electors” who do not vote in line with their state’s popular vote in presidential elections.
  • E. United States v. Comstock
    United States v. Comstock is a 2010 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld Congress’s authority to civilly commit mentally ill, sexually dangerous federal prisoners beyond their release date under the Constitution’s Necessary and Proper Clause.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a493406c408190957eeec9048a8fb6 completed March 1, 2026, 7:28 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4a0dd4afc81909e4e869356006f33 completed March 1, 2026, 8:26 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69a5dcac4e9c8190bb6903916a6624a8 completed March 2, 2026, 6:53 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:36 p.m.