Triple

T6993304
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Proximal Policy Optimization E162136 entity
Predicate objectiveContains P32133 FINISHED
Object clipping term LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: clipping term | Statement: [Proximal Policy Optimization, objectiveContains, clipping term]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: objectiveContains
Context triple: [Proximal Policy Optimization, objectiveContains, clipping term]
  • A. objectiveIncludes chosen
    Indicates that a broader objective encompasses or contains a specific sub-objective, component, or element as part of its scope.
  • B. usesObjective
    Indicates that an agent employs or applies a particular object, tool, or resource to carry out an action or achieve a goal.
  • C. aimOf
    Indicates that one entity serves as the goal, purpose, or intended target of another entity’s action, plan, or existence.
  • D. followsObjective
    Indicates that one entity pursues, adheres to, or acts in accordance with the goal, plan, or objective defined by another entity.
  • E. actorObjective
    Indicates that an actor has a specific goal, purpose, or intended outcome in relation to another entity or situation.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c68856d7808190ab33ee914640281b completed March 27, 2026, 1:38 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c6dbc30fdc81909244d83c8178755c completed March 27, 2026, 7:34 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c6d7c4a18881908d267137daed828b completed March 27, 2026, 7:17 p.m.
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:32 p.m.