Triple

T699307
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject American Insurance Assn. v. Garamendi E13962 entity
Predicate fullCaseName P3131 FINISHED
Object American Insurance Association et al. v. John Garamendi, Insurance Commissioner of the State of California E13962 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: American Insurance Association et al. v. John Garamendi, Insurance Commissioner of the State of California | Statement: [American Insurance Assn. v. Garamendi, fullCaseName, American Insurance Association et al. v. John Garamendi, Insurance Commissioner of the State of California]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: American Insurance Association et al. v. John Garamendi, Insurance Commissioner of the State of California
Context triple: [American Insurance Assn. v. Garamendi, fullCaseName, American Insurance Association et al. v. John Garamendi, Insurance Commissioner of the State of California]
  • A. American Insurance Assn. v. Garamendi chosen
    American Insurance Assn. v. Garamendi is a 2003 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a California law requiring disclosure of Holocaust-era insurance policies was preempted by the federal government's foreign affairs power.
  • B. Argersinger v. Hamlin
    Argersinger v. Hamlin is a 1972 U.S. Supreme Court case that extended the right to counsel to defendants in misdemeanor cases that may result in imprisonment.
  • C. Branch v. Texas
    Branch v. Texas is a U.S. Supreme Court case addressing the constitutionality and application of the death penalty in the wake of the landmark Furman v. Georgia decision.
  • D. Goldberg v. Kelly
    Goldberg v. Kelly is a landmark 1970 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held welfare recipients are entitled to an evidentiary hearing before their benefits are terminated, significantly expanding procedural due process protections.
  • E. De Canas v. Bica
    De Canas v. Bica is a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a California law regulating the employment of unauthorized immigrants, holding that not all state regulations touching on immigration are preempted by federal law.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a493406c408190957eeec9048a8fb6 completed March 1, 2026, 7:28 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4a0dd4afc81909e4e869356006f33 completed March 1, 2026, 8:26 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69a5dcac4e9c8190bb6903916a6624a8 completed March 2, 2026, 6:53 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:36 p.m.