Triple

T698071
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Georges Seurat E13936 entity
Predicate hasParticularStyle P1609 FINISHED
Object scientific approach to color LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: scientific approach to color | Statement: [Georges Seurat, hasParticularStyle, scientific approach to color]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasParticularStyle
Context triple: [Georges Seurat, hasParticularStyle, scientific approach to color]
  • A. hasStyle chosen
    Indicates that an entity possesses, exhibits, or is characterized by a particular style or manner.
  • B. styleInFull
    Indicates that something is presented, written, or expressed in its complete, unabbreviated, or fully detailed form.
  • C. hasSubstyle
    Indicates that one style is a more specific or subordinate variant of another style within a hierarchical style structure.
  • D. hasHigherStyleThan
    Indicates that one entity’s style is considered superior or more fashionable than another’s.
  • E. hasSongStyle
    Indicates that an entity possesses, is characterized by, or is associated with a particular style or genre of song.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a493406c408190957eeec9048a8fb6 completed March 1, 2026, 7:28 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4a0c99be48190babc37c397b6a186 completed March 1, 2026, 8:25 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a49d2586b081908e052cc5ba1d2685 completed March 1, 2026, 8:10 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:36 p.m.