Triple

T693715
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject thing-in-itself E13850 entity
Predicate hasDebatedStatus P17545 FINISHED
Object whether it is self-contradictory in Kant’s system LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: whether it is self-contradictory in Kant’s system | Statement: [thing-in-itself, hasDebatedStatus, whether it is self-contradictory in Kant’s system]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasDebatedStatus
Context triple: [thing-in-itself, hasDebatedStatus, whether it is self-contradictory in Kant’s system]
  • A. hasDebate
    Indicates that there is a formal discussion or argument between entities, typically presenting opposing viewpoints on a topic.
  • B. hasLongTermDebateOn
    Indicates that there is an ongoing, extended period of discussion, disagreement, or argument concerning a particular topic or issue.
  • C. debatedAt
    Indicates that a debate or formal discussion involving the subject took place at the specified location or event.
  • D. contestedBy
    Indicates that one party challenges, disputes, or opposes a claim, decision, or position held by another party.
  • E. hadVoteIn
    Indicates that an entity participated by casting a vote in a particular decision, election, or voting event.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a493406c408190957eeec9048a8fb6 completed March 1, 2026, 7:28 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4a0b1e1d08190bdd42f57be5c2a6b completed March 1, 2026, 8:25 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a49d23e0a08190b08be9d1eff2a1bb completed March 1, 2026, 8:10 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a49df19c9481909cc9bc33ed7f011b completed March 1, 2026, 8:13 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:36 p.m.