Triple
T693690
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | thing-in-itself |
E13850
|
entity |
| Predicate | epistemicStatusInKant |
P16121
|
FINISHED |
| Object | unknowable by theoretical reason |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: unknowable by theoretical reason | Statement: [thing-in-itself, epistemicStatusInKant, unknowable by theoretical reason]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: epistemicStatusInKant Context triple: [thing-in-itself, epistemicStatusInKant, unknowable by theoretical reason]
-
A.
epistemicStatus
chosen
Indicates the degree of certainty, justification, or knowledge an agent has regarding a particular proposition or claim.
-
B.
philosophicalPositionExpressed
Indicates that an entity articulates, endorses, or otherwise conveys a specific philosophical stance, view, or doctrine.
-
C.
ontologicalAspect
Indicates a fundamental mode or category of being that characterizes how something exists or is realized.
-
D.
canonicalStatus
Indicates the formal or official standing of an entity within an established authoritative or normative system.
-
E.
philosophicalMethod
Indicates the method, approach, or technique used in conducting philosophical inquiry or reasoning.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a493406c408190957eeec9048a8fb6 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:28 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4a0b1e1d08190bdd42f57be5c2a6b |
completed | March 1, 2026, 8:25 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a49d23e0a08190b08be9d1eff2a1bb |
completed | March 1, 2026, 8:10 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:36 p.m.