Triple
T6929710
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Cantor–Bernstein–Schröder theorem |
E160401
|
entity |
| Predicate | relatedTo |
P37
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Cantor's theorem |
E78328
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Cantor's theorem | Statement: [Cantor–Bernstein–Schröder theorem, relatedTo, Cantor's theorem]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Cantor's theorem Context triple: [Cantor–Bernstein–Schröder theorem, relatedTo, Cantor's theorem]
-
A.
Cantor’s theorem
chosen
Cantor’s theorem is a fundamental result in set theory stating that the power set of any set has a strictly greater cardinality than the set itself, implying there is no largest infinity.
-
B.
Cantor’s paradox
Cantor’s paradox is a foundational result in set theory showing that the “set of all sets” cannot exist because its power set would have a strictly larger cardinality, leading to a contradiction.
-
C.
Cantor–Bernstein–Schröder theorem
The Cantor–Bernstein–Schröder theorem is a fundamental result in set theory stating that if each of two sets can be injected into the other, then there exists a bijection between them, so the sets have the same cardinality.
-
D.
Burali-Forti paradox
The Burali-Forti paradox is a foundational logical contradiction in set theory that arises from considering the set of all ordinal numbers, showing that such a totality cannot consistently exist as a set.
-
E.
continuum hypothesis
The continuum hypothesis is a central conjecture in set theory proposing a specific relationship between the sizes of the set of real numbers and the set of natural numbers, famously shown to be independent of the standard axioms of mathematics.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c6884e15208190b9e91487eaafcf85 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6da1f5fcc8190b43f53f90fc1821c |
completed | March 27, 2026, 7:27 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69c7514774d88190af212d7953014703 |
completed | March 28, 2026, 3:55 a.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:27 p.m.