Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Cantor–Bernstein theorem | Statement: [Cantor–Bernstein–Schröder theorem, alsoKnownAs, Cantor–Bernstein theorem]

Target entity: Cantor–Bernstein theorem
Context triple: [Cantor–Bernstein–Schröder theorem, alsoKnownAs, Cantor–Bernstein theorem]

• A. Cantor–Bernstein–Schröder theorem chosen
  The Cantor–Bernstein–Schröder theorem is a fundamental result in set theory stating that if each of two sets can be injected into the other, then there exists a bijection between them, so the sets have the same cardinality.
• B. Cantor’s theorem
  Cantor’s theorem is a fundamental result in set theory stating that the power set of any set has a strictly greater cardinality than the set itself, implying there is no largest infinity.
• C. Cantor’s paradox
  Cantor’s paradox is a foundational result in set theory showing that the “set of all sets” cannot exist because its power set would have a strictly larger cardinality, leading to a contradiction.
• D. Hausdorff maximal principle
  The Hausdorff maximal principle is a foundational result in set theory and order theory stating that every partially ordered set contains a maximal totally ordered subset (a maximal chain), and it is equivalent to the axiom of choice.
• E. Burali-Forti paradox
  The Burali-Forti paradox is a foundational logical contradiction in set theory that arises from considering the set of all ordinal numbers, showing that such a totality cannot consistently exist as a set.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.