Triple
T692276
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Single Large Or Several Small debate |
E13819
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | scientific controversy |
C5012
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: scientific controversy Context triple: [Single Large Or Several Small debate, instanceOf, scientific controversy]
-
A.
scientific paradox
A scientific paradox is a situation, result, or concept in science that appears self-contradictory or incompatible with established theory, yet arises from seemingly sound reasoning or empirical evidence.
-
B.
ecological controversy
An ecological controversy is a sustained public dispute over environmental issues, typically involving conflicting scientific interpretations, economic interests, cultural values, and policy responses regarding human impacts on ecosystems.
-
C.
religious controversy
Religious controversy is a sustained conflict or debate arising from differing beliefs, doctrines, practices, or interpretations within or between religious traditions.
-
D.
theological dispute
A theological dispute is a conflict or debate between individuals or groups over differing interpretations of religious doctrines, beliefs, or sacred texts.
-
E.
scientific skepticism organization
A scientific skepticism organization is a group dedicated to critically examining claims, promoting evidence-based reasoning, and educating the public about the scientific method and critical thinking.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a493406c408190957eeec9048a8fb6 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:28 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:36 p.m.