Triple
T6917158
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Botswana and Zimbabwe |
E160088
|
entity |
| Predicate | haveLegalSystemInfluence |
P24435
|
FINISHED |
| Object | English common law |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: English common law | Statement: [Botswana and Zimbabwe, haveLegalSystemInfluence, English common law]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: haveLegalSystemInfluence Context triple: [Botswana and Zimbabwe, haveLegalSystemInfluence, English common law]
-
A.
legalDoctrineInfluenced
Indicates that one legal doctrine has shaped, informed, or contributed to the development or interpretation of another legal doctrine.
-
B.
legalTraditionInfluenced
chosen
Indicates that one legal tradition has had a formative or shaping influence on the development, principles, or practices of another legal tradition.
-
C.
relatedLegalSystem
Indicates that there is an association or connection between two legal systems, such as influence, similarity, shared origin, or mutual relevance.
-
D.
hasLegalSystemType
Indicates that an entity possesses or is governed by a particular type or form of legal system.
-
E.
courtInfluence
Indicates that one party exerts or holds influence over decisions, outcomes, or behavior within a court or judicial setting.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c6883ab1008190a07129ff06f625d9 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6d9e034cc81908f1e8f31b055e119 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 7:26 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c6d7b93d688190a297244ce81b67ac |
completed | March 27, 2026, 7:17 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:26 p.m.